Monday, February 28, 2011

New York Auto Show 2009: Acura ZDX aimed squarely at BMW X6

After a few weeks of teasing, Acura has finally revealed the ZDX, its new four-door, luxury crossover “coupe” that is clearly aimed at the similarly proportioned BMW X6. The ZDX wears the now familiar shield grille and sharp styling that has spread across the entire Acura lineup. To further emphasize the crossover’s coupiness, Acura designers have hid the rear door handles in the base of the C-pillar. The ZDX rides tall on 20-inch, 9-spoke wheels and also glints under the lights thanks to a number of chrome trim pieces including a pair of shiny dual exhausts out back. Inside you’ll find typical Acura luxury with high quality materials arranged in a high-tech package that includes a new multi-view rear camera system with both a wide angle and top down view. The production ZDX will be V6-powered and kept in line by Acura’s superb Super Handling All-Wheel Drive system.
Feel free to poke around the ZDX in our high-res gallery below. It’s the best expression yet of Acura’s new design language, which has taken some getting used to on its current lineup of sedans. This segment-busting crossover should arrive in dealerships by the fall of 2009, according to Acura.
Acura ZDX
EW YORK, April 8, 2009 – A prototype of the provocative Acura ZDX luxury four-door sports coupe made its world debut at the New York International Auto Show today. The production version of the dramatically styled prototype goes on-sale in the fall of 2009. The segment bending ZDX features stunning coupe-like styling with the added benefit of a commanding presence and flexibility utility.
“The ZDX is truly a luxury performance coupe – plus,” said Jeff Conrad, vice president of Acura sales. “The emotional coupe styling coupled with a luxurious and dramatic interior and surprising versatility, allows the ZDX to define its own segment and attract an entirely new customer.”
The ZDX is designed to break new ground for Acura in the areas of provocative styling, contemporary luxury and meticulous refinement. With its sensuous curves, sharply raked roofline and bold fender flares, the ZDX blurs the distinction between coupe, sedan and sport utility vehicle. Clean, flowing lines start from the headlights and run the length of the car, accentuating the cars presence and grace. In keeping with the coupe-inspired styling, the rear door handles are cleverly concealed in the C-pillar. The all-glass tailgate opens wide to reveal a highly functional cargo space with integrated under-floor storage. The prototype is finished off with stylish dual chrome exhaust outlets and 9-spoke machined wheels fitted with 20-inch Michelin tires.
“From the very first sketch of the ZDX, I wanted to create an emotional vehicle that challenged conventional thinking of what a sports coupe should be,” said Michelle Christensen, ZDX exterior designer. “My goal was to create a strikingly beautiful exterior, and use that attraction to help draw you into the rich interior.”

Arrival: 2009 Acura TL SH-AWD

For 2009, Acura made drastic changes inside and out to its fourth-generation Acura TL. With edgy, albeit polarizing exterior styling and a sporty, tech-laden interior, the new TL shows no signs of getting lost in the entry-luxury crowd. Long Acura’s best-selling model, the TL is now available in either front- or all-wheel-drive configuration, with the former offering a 3.5-liter, 280-horse V-6, the latter a bigger 3.7-liter rated at 305 ponies. Both are backed with a five-speed automatic; a slick six-speed manual will be available with the 3.7 for the 2010 model year.
Per Acura’s usual approach, the TL comes in base trim or with a $3730 Technology Package that adds a 440-watt ELS audio system, navigation with traffic rerouting and Zagat restaurant reviews, Bluetooth, and a decklid spoiler with backup camera. For another grand, the all-wheel-drive TL, dubbed SH-AWD for its “Super Handling All-Wheel Drive,” can be had with high-performance summer tireson 19-inch alloys (versus 18s).
2009 Acura TL SH AWD
For our long-term tester, we opted for the SH-AWD with the Tech Pack and high-performance rubber, which brought the car in at just under $44,000. Thus far, the most discussed water-cooler topic has been our TL’s exterior styling. Some staffers have called it shockingly ugly while others have found it, well, not that bad.
Looks aside, most have found the bevy of other changes quite welcome. While a few consider the TL’s dash a sea of buttons, others have deemed it more agreeable than the button-sea in our long-term Accord as the Acura’s layout is better organized and more intuitive than the Honda’s. Interior room is more than ample for four passengers, but that fifth makes for a snug fit. Seats are wrapped in soft, high-quality leather and offer good support and comfort.
When we had the TL SH-AWD during our 2009 Car of the Year event, it advanced to the second round, earning the title “finalist.” Still, editors’ opinions were split on the dynamics. Half said the torque-vectoring all-wheel-drive system turned the TL into a BMW-fighter. The rest saw it as a BMW wannabe-great up to 7/10ths but not beyond.
Acura claims the TL SH-AWD, with its sport-tuned chassis, was designed to enhance handling dramatically and thus is built exclusively for the enthusiast driver. Does it live up to the hype? Over the next year, we plan to answer that question.




First Drive: 2010 Acura TSX V6 offers more power, performance… more car

Acura has a good thing going in the luxury segment. Unlike Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Audi – but like Lexus – Acura’s best selling car is not its entry-level model: Acura moves more TLs than anything else in its line-up. And unlike those other brands, Lexus included, all of Acura’s offerings carry five-star safety ratings from NHTSA, are rated as top safety picks by the IIHS, and the Automotive Lease Guide has declared that Acura offerings have the best resale value among luxury brands. Now, Honda’s premium division has grown by one with the addition of the TSX V6, and Autoblog was invited to find out if the new, more powerful sedan could keep the brand’s good thing going. Follow the jump to find out.
Shot with a Nikon D70 and Nikon 18-200 lens
The TSX V6 was engineered to fill the gap between the four-cylinder Acura TSX and the relatively new TL. With the latest TL having gone upmarket in several areas, Acura felt there was enough space between its entry and mid-market lines to offer a stepping stone between the two. But this wasn’t strictly about plopping a V6 into a TSX and adding some bigger digits after the dollar sign. According to officials, this car is about creating a more comprehensively sporting version of the TSX, yet one that wouldn’t trod on the bumper of the TL.
2010 Acura TSX V6
If you’re familiar with the 2009 TSX that was introduced last year, then you’re up-to-speed on the TSX V6′s exterior; there were essentially no changes made to the car beyond larger wheels, a V6 badge on the trunk and a different compound on the rear brakes. Even the dual tailpipes are the same size on both cars, and there are no interior changes – not one – to differentiate the four-pot from the sixer. Acura decided the V6′s buyers were looking for sport package identity, they simply wanted more power. So, as with the bionic man, this is an operation to be felt, not seen.But in Acura’s estimation, this is also a car meant to truly compete with the A4, 3 Series, and C-Class. The 2.4-liter four-cylinder in the base TSX has 201 horsepower and 170 lb-ft of torque, leaving it ten horses and 88 lb-ft down versus Audi’s 2.0-liter four. The 3.5-liter V6 in the TSX boosts its numbers to 280 hp and 254 lb-ft, giving it better outputs than the sixers in the Mercedes C350 and Audi A4 3.2, figures bested only by the BMW 335i – and it shades all of them by a hair in the fuel consumption stakes.
As stated, Acura didn’t do anything to the interior, but it still deserves mention. Overall, the inside offers a placid view and the designers have done a good job of providing visual variety. There are plenty of contrasting curves, overlaid with four different plastics treatments throughout and perforated leather inserts in the doors. It won’t grab you by the heart when you take a seat, but it ought to age well – a trait that seems too rare in the luxury segment. (something that would go some way toward explaining that resale value…)
The seats remain wide and comfy. Strikingly, compared to the skinny seatbacks becoming au courant among smaller luxury cars, the side of the seat is thicker than a brick wall. Rear legroom doesn’t appear to be compromised since it’s only the bolsters that create the bulk, but it did come as a surprise.
As for another detail of the interior: we appear to be alone in this, but the dash feels awash in buttons. The steering wheel has 11 buttons on it, seven of them multi-function. The center stack is a button convention with two multi-function knobs as special guests. We’re sure it wouldn’t take much to adapt and find our go-to buttons, but the initial cockpit survey leads us to think Airbus, not Acura.
Still, none of that is any deterrent to enjoying the car. Besides, in this league, it’s the driving that counts.
Acura’s assertion that this wasn’t just about more power but about creating a sportier car is backed up in every way. In our review of the four-cylinder TSX, the engine was said to be “sufficient, but still lacks real grunt,” and the car was described as doing “its job without much fuss, but never gets your adrenaline pumping.”
Not so in the TSX V6. Although the V6 model gains an additional 194 pounds, the additional horsepower and torque offsets the extra poundage. Lay on the gas from a stop in the base TSX and the car aspires to action. In the V6, you only get the action.
The new coil springs and damper settings fore and aft do a terrific job of keeping road harshness away from cabin occupants. They’re aided in the quest for cabin quietude by electronically controlled engine mounts and a feature only available on the V6: Active Sound Control (ASC), a noise cancellation system that filters out certain frequencies.
If you tell a group of automotive scribes that you’ve engineered a sedan for sporty performance and let them loose in twisties, they will, without fail, beat the bejeezus out of it to redline, smoking brakes and beyond, then compare it to the platonic ideal of a rear-drive BMW. Put through that tried-and-true test, the front-drive Acura fares well. Going hot and heavy into a hairpin will get you a serving of understeer and a flashing yellow triangle while the traction control works to keep the ship righted. But we were delighted to find that the flashing yellow light was the most intrusive part of the TC – no piercing whistles, no dominatrix-like clampdown on the brakes, no sudden wondering “Where did the power go?” It was always just enough to keep you going over the road and not over the cliff.
The electronic power steering returned decent feedback. Most importantly, we always knew where to put the wheel when planning a line, and corrections weren’t necessary when we laid the course. The suspension kept to its tasks just as well when flying as it did at town speeds, keeping all the wheels where they needed to be even as the car was squatting and flicking to stay in its lane. The brakes did get tired a bit early. They were fine all the way up and over the mountain, but there was a gradual yet noticeable fade while plugging through corners. Not surprisingly, when we exited the car, the tangy scent of hot brakes was heavy in the air.
However, few of this TSX’s drivers will ever belt this car like it’s a Belmont Stakes runner. And if you are looking for a ride to do your Crank imitation of Jason Statham… you shouldn’t be looking at a TSX anyhow.
Back here on Earth, and off the Hollywood set, the TSX V6 comes good with just about everything you’d want from it. The drive-by-wire throttle that feels like instant-on acceleration at low speeds loosens up nicely on the trot. The five-speed automatic (no manual option on this car) knows its gears and isn’t afraid to kick down, and the extra power pulls the TSX nicely out of apexes. Even though there’s a manual shifting mode with paddles on the steering wheel, we barely used it and rarely called on peak horsepower. The latter doesn’t come on until 6,200 rpm, just 700 rpm shy of the redline, and at that height, even the ASC can’t keep the cabin from becoming vociferous.
The grabby brakes loosen up as well – which is as much down to fade as anything else when it’s really hard going. But maintain a rhythm, don’t stab at the stoppers like a serial killer, and they’ll serve you well.
In short: drive this car like it’s a TSX with more power and better dynamics – not like it’s a Lotus Elise – and you’ll get a fabulously put together package that comes standard with a bucket of kit. If you want a TSX with more power, you’ve got that and more with this model. And if you’re looking for an Acura that handles enthusiastically enough to seriously play on the same pitch as the three gatekeepers of the entry-level premium segment (3, C, and A), here you are. And you’ll get it for less coin than those other cars: base base MSRP is $34,850 plus $810 destination and, if you’re game, $3,100 for the Technology Package. That money will also save you money: you’ll get better gas mileage than those other cars as well.




CONFIRMED: 2010 RDX peeks out on Acura website

Last week, we showed you a few photos of what looked to be the 2010 Acura RDX that had begun floating around the interwebs. A subsequent call to Acura confirmed that they were, in fact, the real deal. Now, without any fanfare, the updated compact crossover has appeared on the company’s website, complete with specification changes and pricing.
As shown earlier, the RDX is indeed on the receiving end of the corporate shield grille rhinoplasty, and also gets new fog lamps and air inlets. The rear end has been cleaned up as well, with new hexagonal exhaust inlets with stylized cutouts and a mesh insert in the fascia’s lower reaches.
2010 Acura RDX
The big news for 2010 is the availability of a front-drive version, which helps shed weight and parasitic drag to increase fuel economy. At an EPA estimated 19 miles-per-gallon city and 24 highway, the RDX still strikes us as behind the curve, but perhaps not as much as the (unchanged) 17/22 figures of the Super Handling All-Wheel Drive (SH-AWD) version.
Predictably, this least-complex RDX is also the cheapest, ringing up at $32,520 plus delivery. If you do want the foul-weather security of all-wheel drive, you’ll have to pay a minimum of $34,520. Plump for the technology package (which includes traffic- and weather-linked sat-nav, premium Acura/ELS surround sound, and so on), you’re looking at $35,620 in front-drive guise, and $37,620 for all-wheel drive.
We see no mention of streaming audio as hinted at earlier, but Bluetooth telephony is still part of the mix. Further, a rearview camera will come standard, even if one doesn’t pony up for the Technology pack with navigation.
No matter which model you choose, the RDX continues to be motivated by the same turbocharged, intercooled 2.3-liter four-cylinder, giving 240 horsepower at 6,000 rpm and 260 pound-feet of torque at 4,500 rpm.
We’ll keep our eyes peeled for an official press release and a full complement of high-res images, but for now, enjoy our screencap’d gallery below.




Saturday, February 26, 2011

2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon priced from $30,960

During a product briefing today, Acura executives revealed that the 2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon will be priced from $30,960 (not including $860 for destination) when it goes on sale in just a few weeks. This represents a price increase of $1,350 versus the slightly refreshed 2011 TSX sedan that recently debuted at the Los Angeles Auto Show.
All TSX Sport Wagons come standard with a leather-trimmed interior, premium seven-speaker sound system, XM radio, USB audio with iPod integration, Bluetooth connectivity and a power moonroof. For an extra $3,650 you can opt for the TSX Technology Package, which adds sat-nav with voice recognition and rear-view camera, an ELS surround audio system, GPS-linked solar-sensing climate control and a power liftgate out back.
The only engine available in the Sport Wagon is the TSX’s 2.4-liter inline-four, mated exclusively to a five-speed automatic transmission (a six-speed manual is available on the sedan). 201 horsepower is perfectly adequate for the Sport Wagon, but we’re curious as to why Acura felt it necessary to leave the sedan’s 280-hp V6 mill out of the mix. We’ll have the full report of how the TSX Sport Wagon fares out on the road in the coming weeks, so stay tuned.

First Test: 2010 Acura MDX

It was hard to follow a trio of silver Lexus RXs on the freeway — as I did this morning — without wondering what on earth could be going through their driver’s minds. Whatever it was though, my suggestion would be they quickly see a doctor. Outbreaks of mass automotive repetition like this on our highways need to be nipped in the bud.
Fortunately, there’s a treatment for the particular strain I witnessed — medically referred to as Silver Lexus Crossover Syndrome, I think — and that’s Acura‘s latest MDX. First of all, the MDX is never, ever, seen in groups of three (let alone two, come to think of it). And while the Acura is a bit pricier than the RX (by about eight percent, comparing AWD base versions), for it you’re rewarded with a handles-like-no-other-crossover experience, made better for 2010 by a fairly comprehensive sprucing.
What’s spruced most of all is an all-new 3.7-liter V-6 engine featuring a higher compression ratio and a bigger throttle body girded by a stronger crankshaft and connecting rods, a more rigid block, and better cooling. On paper, all this revamping appears to be kind of puzzling, as its maximum power is not only identical to its predecessor’s (both offering 300 horses from 3.7 liters), but the new engine’s torque actually decreases 5 pound-feet, to 270. The riddle’s answer is that the new engine’s peak power is at 300 more rpm while its maximum torque appears at 500 fewer revs. In other words, it’s tremendously more flexible. It also gets better mileage, by 1 mpg both in the city and on the highway.
2010 Acura MDX
Magnifying the MDX’s flexibility even further is a new six-speed automatic (replacing the previous five-speeder) that Acura claims to be the most advanced transmission it’s ever built. Notably, gears one through 5 are tightly spaced so you’re never caught flat-footed, while sixth is a tall, relaxed-cruising cog. And among its various coolnesses are paddle-shifts, grade logic, consultation with the lateral-g level before shifting, hill-start assist, two shift modes, and a transmission cooler.In addition to Acura’s remarkable SH-AWD (Super-Handling All Wheel Drive), which can vector the rear wheel’s lateral torque split (and aided by stiffer trailing arm mounts) a new, topline Advanced Entertainment Package offers available 19-inch wheels and magneto-rheological dampers to make the MDX one sweet-handling crossover. Oh, and its new fascia and other visual revisions, should also make the 2010 MDX little easier to remember too, come trade-in time for my numerous RX-driving freeway companions.
At the track, the MDX’s numerous technical improvements translate into a sprightly 0-to-60 time of 6.8 seconds – though that number is highly misleading as the MDX’s multitude of gears reward it with far quicker downshift reactions than you might expect. And given the MDX’s tallish center of gravity, its 120-foot stopping distance from 60 is tolerable, considering its Michelin tires’ all-season nature — which is good for light snow, opines the Tire Rack. However, at 255 mm in width, we suspect you might not comfortably venture into snow much deeper than that.
Those wide tires and their surprisingly squat, 50-series sidewalls (and their accompanying sport-oriented suspension) deliver a decidedly firm ride, so the MDX is probably not a good choice for transporting vials of nitroglycerine or herniated disc patients (and definitely not both). But, gosh, was the MDX ever explosive (and maybe spine dislocating) around our figure-eight course. Beyond its best lap’s respectable 26.7-second time is the lateral-g number generated during the execution – 0.85 g. Gads, that’s respectable for a performance car. With MDX’s flat stance, quick pickup of cornering grip turning off-center, snap-your-fingers-quick paddle shifts, and extraordinary SH-AWD system, the MDX simply handles better than crossover within multiples of its price.
Negatives (beside that raised flag about ride quality)? While we like the 2010 MDX’s visual freshening, its looks continue to suggest a transformer impatient to reconfigure its appearance. And you might have noticed our test MDX’s startling $54,565 price.
Understand that ours was the full-boat edition, including navigation system and a multiview rear camera (ingredients of the Tech Package), active dampers, blind spot detection, sport leather seats, and pre-braking for stopping emergencies (grouped under the Advance Package banner) as well as such comforts as a rear DVD display and heated second-row seats (these, part of the Entertainment Package). Remember that our Acura’s extraordinary vehicle dynamics can all be for $52,665 by adding the Advance Package alone (and even in base, $43,040 trim, the MDX still includes its SH-AWD system).
And of course, considered as an antidote for that dreaded Silver Lexus Crossover Syndrome I so tragically witnessed on the way to work this morning, it’s priceless.

The best AWD systems:Acura tested in Cold Weather

Less than 50 miles from the Canadian border lies Baudette, Minnesota, population 1,084. If the combination of ice fishing, heavy drinking and frozen extremities isn’t your thing, the whole region is of little interest. But just outside the town proper lies one of the most advanced cold-weather testing facilities on the planet. It’s also a hoon’s heaven.
Automotive Enviro Testing (AET) is the creation of Larry Larson, an alfalfa farmer by trade and man made up of the most hardened Minnesotan stock. Back in 1993, Larson purchased the 780-acre swath of frozen desolation from the Feds once the U.S. Air Force’s radar base was decommissioned after a 40-year run keeping tabs on the Ruskies. The massive radar stand remains, but the rest of the facility is a modern engineering masterpiece.
Originally, Larson set up a testing course on one of the adjacent frozen lakes, and when that location proved popular, he decided to expand the facility with a sizable amount of guidance from Honda.
Acura Cold Weather Testing
The result is one of the most awe-inspiring automotive playgrounds in the world, with the crown jewel – a 1.8-mile snow-packed oval surrounding a Vehicle Dynamics Area (VDA) stretching 3,650 feet long and 650 feet wide – at its heart. Peppered through the facility are three autocross tracks, along with a slush pool, a nine-lane hill with varying angles and textures, split and alternating mu (one side snow, the other side ice) ovals and a 1.15-mile off-road course with every imaginable hill, mound and snowy obstacle your imagination can muster. Yes, this is your dream backyard. And yes, it gets better.
The breadth and scope of AET is beyond impressive, but it’s the little things that boggle the mind. Here’s just a taste of the ludicrous attention to detail: The VDA, where I experienced my impromptu snow mound mounting, is “Zero-Flat,” meaning it’s a perfect plane from one end to the other. Simple enough, no? No. Baudette only gets around one meter of snow each year, so in order to create that flat, frozen expanse, Larson and his team begin pumping 10 million gallons of water into the field in November, and to reach the desired depth – four inches – the process takes nearly a month. Once it’s frozen solid (temperatures of 30 to -40 degrees fahrenheit ensure that it stays solid over the 16-week testing season), Larson’s alfalfa farming know-how comes into play
AET has taken old-school work-horses (tractors) and fitted them with new-school tech (GPS). Combined with custom-made plowers that do everything from creating ice (imagine 20 flamethrowers mounted to the rear of a plow) to scraping up snow (same plow, but with a few dozen razor-sharp circular blades), Larson and Co. can create whatever environment Acura’s boffins are after. And deliver something that’s invaluable to engineers: Consistency.
The Crew
The man that issued (maybe regrettably) the “don’t hold back” edict is Ted Klaus, one of Honda’s chief engineers and one member of the team that spends five to six weeks at the facility each year. Along with Principle Engineers Jeff Ertz, Jason Widmer and Mike Unger, they constitute a relative rarity in the automotive world – they’re both engineers and test drivers – a distinction that was hammered home countless times during my stay.
The Gauntlet
The day began in a -40 degree “cold cell” that the engineers use to test everything from the door seals to the defrosters. Mercifully, they kept it to a balmy -20 degrees during our time inside, but I’m convinced I left part of a toe on the floor when entering the MDX (Note: thin-soled driving mocs are not suitable winter attire).
Within about 10 seconds of turning over (and it started instantly, dontchaknow), the windows began to defrost and defog, and Acura’s attention to detail literally shown through. Not only was the windshield nearly completely clear in a matter of minutes, but the front edge of the side windows – exactly where you’d look to see the wing mirrors – was frost-free. Impressive.
Next up was the slush pit, an 18-inch deep trough filled with near frozen water and chunks of hardened snow. The test involves driving through the pit at a normal speed and then running around the course, throwing ice, snow and assorted frozen detritus onto the undercarriage. The result is 800 pounds of ice stuck to the bottom of the MDX and ZDX to see if the brakes, suspension, wheels and other underbody bits cope with the added weight and limited movement. A quick glimpse under a pre-treated TL shows the after effects. See that chunk of ice extending into the wheel? That’s the control arm. And for the record, they were able to drive the sedan onto a rack with over an inch of ice cracking off the wheels from the friction of the calipers.
The Kit and the Contenders
If you’re getting the idea that all these exercises are obscenely extreme, you’re right. But when you’re engineering a vehicle to tackle a variety of climates and last into the next decade, it’s a necessity. But what about the competition?
The first exercise of the afternoon involved three paved hills with a sheet of ice set down the middle. Strapped into the Audi Q7, it made quick work of the 20 percent grade, even when we stopped midway up and gave it the boot. Both the MDX and Lexus RX350 on hand (all the vehicles were wearing all-season rubber, with the exception of the TL and 335xi) tackled the icy grade without much problem, either. Then came time to run up the 30% grade. As expected, the MDX – with its torque-vectoring all-wheel drive – was able to stop at the midway point and then scurry its way to the top in undramatic fashion. The RX and Q7? Not so much. Both were an angry wheel-spinning, frantic counter-steering mess, and on at least one occasion we had to slide backwards to make another go of it.
On the mile-plus off-road course, it was a similar situation.
While the Audi’s Quattro system was able to manage most of the climbs, hills and bumps with relative ease, it’s excessive weight and obtrusive traction control meant that first, second and sometimes third attempts were necessary to scale the obstacles ahead. And the RX was a bit of a disaster.
The comparatively low-tech AWD system that Lexus employs on its best-selling CUV is more comfortable traipsing through dirt-strewn wineries than Minnesotan winters. This was made all the more apparent when we clambered up one side of a snowy mound only to get stuck in the valley leading up to the next five-foot-tall frozen heap. With the traction control enabled, any hint of spin automatically shuts off power to the offending wheel. When we finally disabled the system (which took nearly five minutes and we’re still unsure how we did it), we ground our way down to terra firma before one of the AET pickups arrived to our rescue (a Ram, natch).
The Tech
Obviously, the point of this frozen expedition wasn’t just to show off the rigors of Honda’s winter testing regimen; Acura wants to highlight its wonderfully Japanese-named Super Handling All-Wheel Drive (SH-AWD).
Just as a brief primer, SH-AWD is one of the first mass-marketed torque-vectoring all-wheel drive systems, which allows power to be delivered in precise measurements to individual wheels. Unlike traditional transfer cases or full-time four-wheel drive systems, SH-AWD takes in yaw rate, steering angle, throttle input, brake pressure, longitudinal Gs and a host of other information from a variety of sensors and then distributes power exactly where it’s needed.
Here’s a simple example: Let’s say your trundling along on the highway in a TL. In a high-speed, steady-state cruising situation, around 90 percent of the power is being sent to the front wheels (where traction is the best) and the other 10 percent is being dolled out to the rears. Now a deer jumps out of a thicket. You instinctively brake, turn the wheel to the right and accelerate around Bambi. During that split-second maneuver, the sensors send a Cray’s worth of information to the SH-AWD system, resulting in the right rear wheel getting more torque than the left and the left front wheel getting more twist than its counterpart on the right. Balanced. Neutral. Controlled.
In that high-speed scenario, the power transition is smoother and slower, so it doesn’t upset the vehicle’s footing and result in a spin. Conversely, at a slower speed, the torque transfer can be more liberal and quicker as you’re further away from the limits of adhesion and balance is less of an issue. Since it’s introduction on the 2005 RL, SH-AWD has proliferated throughout Acura’s lineup to include the MDX, RDX and TL. And Acura must be doing something right, because the new “it” feature of the decade is “e-diffs” – a similar take on SH-AWD, although usually reserved for the rear wheels.
The Tune
To illustrate the customization of SH-AWD, Acura hacked up an MDX with a laptop, some cables and a black box with a small knob controlling torque output front-to-rear. Once situated in the crossover, we headed out onto one of the snowy autocross tracks to tune our own driving experience and in the process discovered that the MDX gets the award for Most Unlikely Drift Machine.
With 100 percent of the torque dialed back to the rear wheels, crossed-up sideways fun was a flick and a punch away. Although overall throttle control left a bit to be desired, after tweaking the settings, a 30:70 power split seemed to be the perfect recipe for tail-out heroics… in a CUV.
And the surprises didn’t stop there.
The laptop allowed our hapless passenger to dial in different degrees of steering angle to trick the system into thinking we were cranking the wheel at double the actual rate. As expected, the new setting took a mental rejiggering while sliding from bend to bend, but the real effect could be felt out back, with a perceivable shift in power to the inside rear wheel on corner exit. Essentially, it magnified torque output and – depending on the bend – had us shooting through corners quicker and with more control. The net effect of all this tuning time was obvious when we took an unmolested MDX out on the same course to see how the system adapted to whatever I could muster. It was a seamless, uninterrupted flow of perfectly predictable power and surprisingly communicative steering. I walked away in awe, convinced that if you’re in the hunt for an upmarket CUV and you’re living in one of the nation’s colder climes, the MDX is the ticket. Bar none.
The Chassis Challenge
But no matter how fancy the all-wheel-drive system, no matter how many chips and sensors are on board, it’s the chassis underneath that’s the fundamental ingredient. On several occasions, each member of the team detailed how chassis development came first – everything else is secondary – and that, to quote the esteemed Mr. Klaus, “The driver is the most intelligent part of the vehicle.” That focus on melding the mind with the underpinnings was abundantly clear with the MDX – and by extension, the ZDX – which took all comers. But with the TL, it was a slightly different story.
As our man Sam attested to in his recent review, the six-speed manual-equipped TL is a new high-watermark for Acura. In conjunction with Acura’s high-tech all-wheel drive system, the TL is one of the first credible sports sedans to come from the brand in recent memory.
On the snow, it’s a similar situation, but there’s a rub.
Acura lined up a manual TL next to a (regrettably) auto ‘box-equipped BMW 335xi to show off the TL’s superior AWD, and – more importantly – its brilliant traction control system (VSA in Acura parlance). Winding my way through the course in the 335xi with the TC enabled was an exercise in frustrating futility. Any hint of slip resulted in an instant loss of power and the occasional explicative. As my speed increased, the party stopped even quicker. After an exasperated two laps, I held down the orange DTC button and the 335xi was transformed. Tail out, opposite lock antics were mine for the taking as the back end pirouetted out of line and the steering cried out direction like a Finnish co-driver. What started with disappointment evolved into a chuckle, then a laugh, then a hellacious cackle as I slid from bend to bend, reveling in my newfound Makineness. By the time I pulled in to swap vehicles, my lips were cracked – not from the cold, but from the ear-to-ear grin I maintained for a half-dozen laps.
Back in the TL, things felt a bit bloated. While the Acura comes in only 75 pounds heavier than the Bimmer and shares a similar wheelbase (109.3 for the TL versus 108.7 for the 335), the only discernible difference is length: the TL stretches an extra seven inches over the 3 Series. But length wasn’t the issue.
On my first two and half laps around with the VSA on, the Acura’s superlative torque shuffling was a revelation and in stark contrast to BMW’s slip and stop setup. Although there was a barely perceptible loss in power when caning it around the course, the adaptive nature of the SH-AWD made navigating the frozen track a point-and-squirt affair. Simply line up for the corner, lift off the throttle, dab the brake and just past the apex start feeding in the power. Just like the MDX, the experience was so engaging and reassuring that even a snow-averse California boy (me) could handle the task with aplomb. With the VDC off, I spun. Twice.
Despite my best attempts to anticipate the back end coming around or the front end losing grip, when in maximum attack mode, the combination of desensitized steering and a noticeable lack of seat-of-the-pants feedback meant I was crossed-up more often than not. It was far from fun, but with the VDC back on, the safe, controllable nature was restored and the pace quickened two-fold. Naturally, most drivers aren’t going to disable the traction control when the white stuff is four inches deep, but the experience was telling; the winner unclear.
The Ultimate Winter Wonderland
Our final stop for the day was the aforementioned VDA, that massive swath of perfectly flat ice coated in a few inches of finely manicured snow. According to Larson, at 20 degrees it was too hot, so we weren’t getting the full slip-and-slide experience. But no matter, with a ZDX, an X6 and an Infiniti FX35 on hand, it shouldn’t be difficult to enjoy myself.
The purpose of the VDA is to perform simple, everyday maneuvers that the average driver contends with and assess how the powertrain reacts. Think left and right turns from a stop, foot-down throttle launches and emergency braking maneuvers. Ten minutes of that and we got the idea. Now it’s time to see who can maintain the longest prolonged snow spray.
In a (nearly) consequence-free environment, the amount of information traveling up your posterior and through your arms is almost overwhelming. Steady-state circles evolve into massive, snow-spewing powerslides as you gradually up the power, sense the slightest loss of traction and keep your foot planted to the floorboard. What were subtle, transient body motions when gradually drawing Ss in the snow at speed become noticeable – sometimes startling – pauses in directional change, things that Acura’s engineers have managed to all but remove from the ZDX, yet are barely perceivable on the X6 and glaring obvious on the Infiniti.

Drive Experience: 2010 Acura ZDX is a space (challenged) oddity

Needless to say, the 2010 Acura ZDX is a peculiar beast. And after a week’s worth of testing, we’re still not sure what to make of it.
But just for some context, let’s begin with the fact that despite a similar fastback, five-door body style, the Acura ZDX is not related to the Honda Accord Crosstour. Honda’s jacked-up hatch is substantially larger than the ZDX and far more useful. Instead, it’s best to think of the ZDX as a rake-roofed version of the MDX – a high-riding four-door coupe (assuming you buy into the marketing spiel) akin to its closest competitor, the BMW X6. Both models share similar designs and purposes – although the 2010 Acura ZDXmaxes out in price and performance where the German starts off – and both possess some of the attributes of a two-door layout – compromises and all.
Before we get to the main course, here’s a little “inside baseball” info that should be included: When an automaker starts the process of launching of a new vehicle, the business, marketing and engineering teams gather together to figure out what the Next Big Thing is. Product planners show a series of charts comparing attributes like price, performance and utility, and plot out various products from both themselves and the competition. With all of that knowledge in front of them, they find an empty slot in the chart – the so-called “white space” – and proclaim that this is where their next wonderwagon will reside.
Review 2010 Acura ZDX
While “white space” products can yield great results (the Ford Transit Connect, original Scion xB and Subaru Forester come to mind), there are times when there’s a reason for leaving the space blank. Like the X6, the ZDX may well fall into the category of “Why bother?”Obviously, the ZDX isn’t going to sway the opinion of those unenthused about Acura’s current styling direction. On the other hand, this might be Acura’s most successful application of its new aesthetic. From the prominent can-opener grille to its pinched tail, the overall design is far more cohesive than some of Acura’s recent efforts. But despite that, it’s still polarizing.
Combined with its deeply drawn doors and an inboard greenhouse, the result is a husky appearance that would be far more attractive if it were riding at the same altitude as a sedan. As it is, the ZDX looks like a rally-raid buggy built for Dakar… on Mars.
Compared to the aforementioned other vehicles, the body comes in four inches shorter than the Crosstour and just slightly longer than the X6. But where the ZDX differs from the Crosstour, MDX and its BMW doppelganger is the position of its roof and floor.
The Crosstour has six inches of ground clearance with the ZDX at 7.9 inches and the MDX at 8.2 inches. However, the ZDX has the lowest roof height, standing at 62.8 inches with the Crosstour at 65.7, MDX at 68.2 and the BMW at 66.5 inches. The reason we mention this is when you open the door there’s a typical SUV tall step in, but combined with the lower door opening, taller occupants may have to duck to clear their heads, particularly in back. The high floor means you get the tall hip-point that seems to attract people to SUVs and crossovers, but the limited roof clearance requires the seat to be mounted lower to the floor. Instead of the expected upright seating position, sitting in the ZDX is almost sports car-like, aside from the fact that your rear is further from the ground.
While the seating position is peculiar in the context of the ZDX’s height, the rest of the interior will be familiar to those who have sampled Acura’s recent products. The sweeping dual cockpit layout in the front is similar to what you’ll find in a TL or TSX. However, the strip of aluminum that spans those sedans has been slimmed down in favor of a hand-wrapped and sewn leather covering. The combination of the seamless, soft-touch upper dash and the leather trim is attractive, but there’s a very visible, if minor, problem. Where the leather-covered parts sweep down to the center console, there is a seam between the upper and lower portions. Because of the leather wrapping, the seam is more prominent than it should be and fails to keep with the upscale look Acura is after. However, redemption is found in the rest of the cockpit, including a reassuringly thick steering wheel and Acura’s superlatively supportive seats. And then you get to the back.
The sweeping greenhouse means that even with the seat cushions mounted low, headroom is at a premium for anyone hovering around six-feet tall. Worse than that is the rear door opening, which has shrunk both vertically and longitudinally, causing more than one instance of unintended head-banging when getting in and out. Acura admits that the ZDX is targeted more towards couples, but we have to question why you have rear seats when ingress, egress and overall comfort is so severely compromised in the first place.
Acura may have sacrificed rear passenger volume to style, but luggage capacity remains plentiful. With the rear seat up, the ZDX can swallow 26.3 cubic feet, a volume that grows to 56 cubic feet with the rear thrones folded flat. The tall rear deck and flat cargo sides make for a useful luggage area, and Acura has also included a trio of hidden storage areas below the rear load floor and in each rear corner.
Pressing the red start button yields a bit of a surprise with an engine note that’s decidedly more aggressive than we’ve grown accustomed to from Acura – up to and including the six-speed manual-equipped TL. The aural entertainment proves pleasant, especially under hard acceleration. We’ve always been fond of Acura’s V6, and this one is no exception thanks to its 300 horsepower and 270 pound-feet of torque. It revs freely to its 6,600 rpm redline and never complains about having to work hard. Of course, with the ZDX’s 4,452-pound curb weight, the V6 has its work cut out for it. To be fair, a decade ago, a 0-60 mph time in the low six-second range would have been nothing to sneeze at for a 300-hp vehicle, but in 2010 it’s merely so-so.
Unfortunately, Honda’s all-new six speed automatic transmission doesn’t help the performance situation. The steering wheel-mounted paddles allow some manual control, although tapping the flippers up or down seems to be more of a suggestion rather than a control interface – ratios will only be switched when the electronics are good and ready. Running the 3.7-liter V6 up to the far end of the tach will still trigger automatic upshifts even in “manual” mode, but on the plus side, when the cogswaps arrive, they are quick and smooth.
Acura’s torque-vectoring Super Handling-All Wheel Drive (SH-AWD) was one of the first such systems to come to market and remains one of our favorites. The electronically controlled clutches in the rear axle actively send drive torque to the outside wheel to help push the ZDX around a corner and counteract understeer. Press the CUV into a series of corners and it tracks through neutrally, no muss, no fuss and decidedly un-crossover-like. While the ZDX is no off-roader, if your commute includes a brisk run down a gravel road, the SH-AWD is more than capable of dealing with lower grip situations.
Unlike the TL and TSX, the ZDX retains hydraulic power steering. However, Acura has added an electronic control system to vary the amount of boost according to speed and the position of the Integrated Dynamics System (IDS). IDS adjusts the settings of the active dampers along with the steering, and the hydraulic steering assist gives the ZDX a tighter feel devoid of dead spots. We tried the IDS in both Sport and Comfort modes and ended up deferring to Sport for the majority of our drives. The suspension does a good job of soaking up the worst that Michigan roads can offer, while keeping the body level with minimal vertical motion.
Aside from the lazy transmission response, the ZDX surprised us dynamically. Unfortunately, the design imposes some serious compromises in the name of style. Assuming you can live with something closer to a 2+2 and aren’t put off by the deeper seating position, the ZDX has its attributes. However, the bigger sticking point is its price tag. Our ZDX was equipped with the Advance package (adaptive cruise control, collision mitigation braking, etc.) and stickered for a steep $56,855. The price may seem high for an Acura, but even maxed-out, that’s still about $500 less than the entry tariff for an X6. The BMW is roomier and ultimately more engaging, though, and if you need more than 300 hp (and who doesn’t?) the X6 offers up three different V8 options, including a hybrid and the mighty X6 M.
Ultimately, the decision to buy any vehicle upmarket of the most basic commuter involves a significant emotional element, and there is no doubt that this Acura is capable of stirring up some major gut reactions. The ZDX has arguably the best implementation to date of Acura’s design philosophy and generally very good driving dynamics despite its compromised package. In the end, though, the rumblings in our gut are closer to cramped discomfort than excited butterflies. The fundamental premise of a high riding and very heavy 2+2 strikes us as silly unless you are going to take the idea to its (il)logical zenith with some insane performance like the BMW X6 M. Barring that, we’d rather see Acura’s product planners focus on the kind of smaller, lighter, white spaces that Soichiro Honda likely would have filled were he still kicking around the headquarters that bears his name.

First Test: 2010 Acura ZDX

Whether you like the daring curves of Acura‘s all-new ZDX crossover, there’s no denying that there is something super about its shape — it stands out among today’s array of sport/utilities like an Armani suit at 24 Hour Fitness. While one editor thought the ZDX resembled a “Mitsubishi’s Dakar-racing Pajero Evo mated with a TL,” an overwhelming majority of our team was drawn to this audacious Acura. “Calling the Acura ZDX distinctive is an understatement,” says associate Web producer Carlos Lago. “It looks otherworldly. It’s the best looking vehicle in Acura’s camp — and I mean that as a compliment. Love the view from the rear. Its strong, wide shoulders give a dominant, purposeful shape.” Editor at large Arthur St. Antoine says, “I’ll admit it: I was taken aback — no, shocked — by my first sight of the ZDX in the metal. This thing is out there-to my eye, way edgier and more futuristic-looking than the X6. But the more I looked, the more I found the ZDX…interesting. Even…stunning.”
2010 Acura ZDX
We experienced similar fuzzy feelings from behind the wheel. Slide into this so-called “four-door sports coupe” — watch your head, because the sloping roofline is lower than you expect, especially when entering the back seat — and you’re treated to the most elegant cabin in a luxury Honda to date. A leather-stitched dash? You bet. Leather-stitched door panels, too? Why not. Even the cargo area is lined with premium loop-style carpet that wouldn’t look out of place in a Beverly Hills living room. Our top-of-the-line test vehicle, equipped with the available Advance Package, also included ventilated front seats, blind-spot warning system, adaptive cruise control, Collision Mitigating Braking System (CMBS), and Acura’s new Integrated Dynamics System (IDS), which allows for adjusting the dampers between comfort and sport modes. Lest we forget, the Advance Package encompasses everything in the available Technology Package — ELS premium audio, Bluetooth phone and streaming audio, backup camera, and navigation with traffic and weather updates.Step on the throttle and turn the fat-rimmed three-spoke leather-wrapped wheel, and those fuzzy feelings are quickly transfused with adrenaline. Underhood resides a 3.7-liter single-cam V-6 that routs 300 horses and 270 pound-feet through a new six-speed automatic and Acura’s signature “Super Handling” all-wheel-drive system. Zero to 60 takes just 6.5 seconds and lateral grip, at 0.83 g, falls right in sport-sedan territory. Depending on how you set the IDS, the ride can be tuned from sporty firm to tautly supple. And even with our lead foots spurring it along, the ZDX delivered 17.1-mpg observed fuel economy.
While its most direct competitor, the 300-horse twin-turbo BMW X6 xDrive 35i, is quicker to 60 (5.9 seconds) and around the skidpad (0.87 g), the ZDX is more fun to drive. The reason, unsurprisingly, is weight. At 4445 pounds, the ZDX is no bantam, but it tips the scales with 540 fewer pounds than a comparably equipped X6. Sure, the BMW’s twin-turbo I-6 and nifty xDrive all-wheel drive make it quick in a straight line and around a circle, but it can’t cheat the laws of physics and mask 4985 pounds when tackling a twisty road. What about the Infiniti FX? Yes, in terms of test numbers and road manners, the lighter 4293-pound FX35 AWD is more akin to the ZDX, scooting to 60 in 6.1 seconds and around the skid pad with 0.82 g of lateral grip. Nevertheless, while it’s a looker, the FX doesn’t wear the shock-and-awe lines of the ZDX, nor is it as fun to drive, lacking the Acura’s utter sure-footedness.
Then there’s the value proposition. A base ZDX, which comes standard with 19-inch wheels, Xenon headlamps, leather, power/heated front seats, power moonroof and tailgate, XM satellite radio, and Bluetooth, should start in the neighborhood of $44,000. A base X6, which offers heated front seats, power tailgate, satellite radio, and Bluetooth as options, opens at $56,725. When similarly equipped, the Acura should represent a $10,000-$15,000 savings compared with the BMW. And the Infiniti? An FX35 AWD starts at $44,465 and, unlike the Acura, doesn’t come standard with Bluetooth, 19-inch wheels, or paddle shifters. Tart up an FX to mimic a ZDX with the Advance Package, and you’re looking at a $50,000-plus crossover.
Of course, the ZDX isn’t perfect. A couple demerits worth mentioning are the challenging ingress/egress, a cramped back seat (it offers less headroom and legroom than in a Mazda RX-8), and somewhat compromised cargo capacity, which, at 26.3 cubic feet, is less than in the stubbier and narrower Audi Q5. That said, Acura isn’t marketing the ZDX as a family transporter; rather, it’s a “passionate getaway” car for two adults. So if you need a rig for hauling the spouse and kids, Acura will gladly point you in the direction of the RDX and MDX. Otherwise, opt for the ZDX. No other Acura is as engaging to drive or scintillating to behold — period.

2010 Acura TL SH-AWD 6MT is a mouthful, not a handful

When the redesigned Acura TL debuted in late 2008, it represented a substantial transformation over previous iterations. The third-generation model retained the transverse V6 of its two predecessors, but for the first time included an all-wheel-drive option. But while the torque-vectoring Super Handling-All Wheel Drive is an appreciated addition when you’re putting out over 300 horsepower, performance oriented drivers were appropriately miffed that both the TL Type-S and a manual transmission were no longer available.
Thankfully, shortly after the 2009 TL went on sale, Acura announced plans to add a manual gearbox back to the lineup. Unfortunately, it would take an entire year before it hit the market. Now it’s here, and we’re ready to find out if the Acura TL SH-AWD six-speed can fill the Type-S-sized hole in our hearts.
When Acura took the wraps off its new look in 2008, it was hard to ignore the controversial styling – particularly the shield grille. But on the TL, it works – at least more effectively than it has in some applications. Like the new ZDX, the fascia integrates well with the creased lines and hard strakes, and when viewed from the rear, the pointed protuberance matches the plummeting trunk line.
The vast majority of observers howled at the brand’s controversial styling, particularly that new shield grille. Pundits and reviewers have applied an assortment of derogatory names to the grille, and the majority of the Autoblog team has gone on record continuing to hate it. This particular writer remains the exception to that consensus, and aside from the “refreshed” RL, believes the face works well here. The TL and ZDX in particular seem to have the best integration of the fascia with the rest of the vehicle. Thankfully at least one Detroit police officer felt the same way during a traffic stop following an inappropriate left hand turn in an unfamiliar part of the city. Following a stern warning about the driver’s navigational skills, he spent the next several minutes just talking about the car.
Although the last generation TL had the cleanest design of any Acura to date, the current model has its strong points. The proportions of the hood, greenhouse and rear deck seem particularly well thought out, but where the design continues to fall flat is in its ratio of wheelbase to overall length. An additional four inches in the middle would do wonders to reduce the overhangs and provide the TL with better overall balance.
Since most observers remain less-than-enamored with Acura’s current styling direction, it’s likely that the next generation of products will be softened in a similar way to the 2002 BMW 7 Series. During a visit to the Honda design studio in Japan last fall, Nobuki Ebisawa, General Manager of Global Design discussed the reaction to the new Acura language and hinted that changes could be forthcoming. For now, we’ll have to live with what we have – in this case a Mayan Bronze Metallic tester that appears to be molded out of dark chocolate infused with metal flakes – and keep in mind that drivers typically spend more time inside the car rather than staring at it from the outside.
From the driver’s perch, the TL remains an enjoyable place to conduct business, beginning with front seats that provide an excellent balance of support and comfort. The sweeping dual cockpit layout is thankfully devoid of any wood and instead is highlighted with strips of speckled metal trim. While we have nothing against dead tree inlays, the highly polished veneers infecting most interiors often look overwrought, making even the finest real wood look like the cheap plastic stuff.
The primary controls in the TL are well positioned, with a thick-rimmed steering wheel adjustable for both distance and height, and there’s a perfect gap between the wheel and manual shifter. Through that wheel’s rim, the large, round gauges are clearly visible and very legible. The information display between the speedometer and tachometer can also be toggled between a number of different readouts, including the torque distribution for the all-wheel drive system. Unfortunately, placing this display in the main cluster pushes it below the driver’s main sight-line while cornering, rendering it largely useless.
Back before Ford introduced its SYNC media interface system, we considered Honda/Acura’s implementation of a control knob one of the better offerings to date. However, time hasn’t been kind to the TL. In particular, digging through the system’s menus to find the Bluetooth setup page for our phone was a major chore, and while controlling an iPod was straightforward enough, the TL would inexplicably change the setting to Repeat each time we plugged it in. Setting a destination in the navigation system is easy enough, although it can grow tedious as you have to select individual letters using the center stack-mounted knob.
The rear seating positions are nicely contoured to provide comfort and support on a road trip. However, anyone attempting to occupy that center position will find his or herself sitting up above their neighbors with a solid-feeling armrest pressing into their backside, so it’s best to keep your party to four for anything longer than a short jaunt.
All TLs with SH-AWD are powered by Honda’s 3.7-liter V6 delivering 305 horsepower at 6,200 rpm and 273 pound-feet of torque at 5,000 rpm. While the automatic version is still saddled with just five forward gears, the manual version gets a sixth cog. Pressing the start button fires the V6 into a smooth, steady idle with the soundtrack you’d expect of a high-tech performance engine. The stop and go pedals are well-placed for easy heel-and-toe downshifts, and the newly added left pedal has a smooth, predictable take-up that engages mid-travel and never feels grabby.
Honda and Acura’s manual gearboxes are known for their smooth, slick mechanisms and short throws, and the TL doesn’t disappoint. Rowing the lever through its gates, there are no hangups or notches, it simply glides from gear to gear like the precise piece of machinery it is. Let out the clutch and the TL pulls away with nary a lurch, even during hurried launches on dry pavement. The engine’s note is more mechanical precision than brutish wail, evolving into a howl as it winds to its 6,700 rpm redline. While the specs remain unchanged, the V6 in this application feels stronger across the range than its automatic counterpart, indicating that the torque converter may have sapped some of the life out of it.
Along with the addition of the manual gearbox, Acura engineers went back and took another look at the power steering calibration. Like most contemporary Honda products, the TL has electric power assist steering (EPAS), which, along with reducing parasitic losses provides for an impressive amount of flexibility with its calibration. Unfortunately, extra flexibility can often make it more difficult for the engineers to find just the right mix.
Think of it like manipulating a digital photo on the computer. There are countless settings and tricks to employ, with the result occasionally ruining the image in the process. While the EPAS on the Honda Fit provides reasonable feedback, that’s not the case with the new TL or its smaller sibling, the TSX. Both sedans are plagued with a slight dead zone when pointed straight ahead, resulting in a lack of engagement while cruising along at a steady state. Surprisingly, the new manual TL is a marked improvement compared to its automatic counterpart, with precise, even steering across the full range of motion. The amount of effort required to turn the tiller now feels spot-on regardless of vehicle speed, but there’s still a lack of connection between cornering force and the wheel’s tendency to straighten up – something we assume could be fixed with a quick reflash.
We’ve always been fond of Acura’s torque vectoring all-wheel drive system whether in sedan or crossover form, and with the TL, it lives up to our expectations yet again. The management of torque distribution to the wheels is integrated with the stability control so that the tractive effort can be sent to outboard wheels under cornering to help the car turn in, mitigating the understeer present in front-wheel-drive models. Think of it as proactive torque steer, but in a good way. The result is much better handling balance and we’re more than willing to put up with the extra mass when it works this well. We’d still prefer a proper rear-wheel-drive chassis most of the time, but if the choice is SH-AWD or front-wheel drive in a “sport” sedan, it’s a no-brainer.
Since life involves more than just carving corners, the TL also deals well with uneven pavement. The sedan doesn’t include a fancy adaptive damping system, but the two-stage “blow-off” dampers do an admirable job of keeping body motions in check while still absorbing potholes and patches without beating up its occupants.
As far as we know, Acura has no plans to re-introduce an actual TL Type-S, so this is as close as you can get for now. Admittedly, most people (at least those who are speaking up) are less than enamored with the styling. However, we found the driving experience of the TL to be a pleasure thanks to the newly available manual transmission and its seamless interaction with the SH-AWD system. For the most part, we aren’t fans of paddle-shifter torque converter automatics, so having the ability to opt for a stick that works this well can make up for a lot of faults. And the price for such a complete package – along with the security of all-wheel drive – is more than reasonable.

Acura 2+1 design study takes superman shield to next level

Acura’s new design language, as seen on the 2009 Acura TL, is fronted by a shield-like appendage that has received mixed reviews. The Acura 2+1 — the numbers describe the seating arrangement — by design student Leon Paz is what would happen if you took the shield theme to one natural conclusion. By maintaining the edge throughout the concept’s “modern baroque styling,” Paz has come up we something we kinda dig.
The body is fashioned from a plastic that is harder than fiberglass, and Paz has done a great job in creating lines that evoke skin stretched over a frame. The upper surface is one continuous window that shows off the twin-turbo V6 and the Acura logo for the cylinder covers. There is no hood — at your yearly service, the dealer would lift the glass and perform any engine maintenance.
Acura 2+1 Concept
The 2+1 would be an aspirational step for those who want an NSX but can’t afford one yet. Based on what we’ve seen of the NSX so far, we’d probably rather have the 2+1. However, our most pressing question about the car isn’t about the design — we really want to know what is the meaning of “OW AHH” scrolled in LED’s across the rear?

Thursday, February 24, 2011

First Drive: 2011 Acura RDX FWD

The Acura RDX was designed to be among the sportiest in its segment, and except for a couple issues, the driving experience of the 2011 model is engaging as with our 2007 Acura RDX long-termer. And that long-termer didn’t benefit from the changes Acura made for the 2010 model year.
Yes, the RDX now wears Acura’s polarizing power plenum grille, but the changes are far more significant than a restyled exterior and attractive new 18-inch wheels. A rear-view camera, changes to the leather seating surfaces, more ambient lighting, and USB-port connectivity now come standard.
When the RDX was introduced, it was available only with Honda’s super-handling all-wheel drive. That strategy was rethought and now there’s the front-drive model we sampled. It boasts a cheaper entry-level price and better fuel economy with the turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine making 240 horsepower at 6000 rpm and 260 pound-feet of torque at 4500 rpm. The engine is plenty powerful, and the turbo surge makes the RDX feel quicker than it really is at times.
2011 Acura RDX FWD

2011 Acura RDX FWD

2011 Acura RDX FWD

2011 Acura RDX FWD

2011 Acura RDX FWD

2011 Acura RDX FWD

2011 Acura RDX FWD

2011 Acura RDX FWD

 Back when we tested our long-term RDX, it sprinted from 0-60 mph at 7.0 seconds. Now that the front-wheel-drive crossover is 200 pounds lighter, expect a slightly improved time. RDX drivers will need to develop a lighter touch with the throttle or else fuel economy will suffer.
The brakes, too, were improved for the refreshed RDX. Acura says the upgrades result in more feel and less grabbiness to the binders, although they still are a touch on the sensitive side. Regardless, there’s no arguing with revised rear brake pad actuation that translates to less drag and longer pad life.
The RDX’s turbo makes it more responsive and engaging to drive than others in the segment, but if there’s a second generation of this vehicle, fuel economy must be a higher priority. The front-drive RDX’s fuel economy is rated at 19/24 mpg city/highway. For comparison, the turbocharged four-cylinder version of the all-wheel-drive 2011 Audi Q5 is rated 20/27 mpg, and the front- drive 2011 Volvo XC60 nets 18/25 mpg. The all-wheel-drive RDX does match the all-wheel-drive turbo XC60 in fuel economy, but the Volvo does it with two additional cylinders and more power and torque.
But the RDX’s turbo engine is part of its charm, and we would be disappointed if Acura offered a naturally aspirated four in its place. Steering feel is the 2011 RDX’s other drawback. More feedback and far more heft from the RDX’s high-quality leather-wrapped steering wheel would be welcome. Steering-wheel-mounted paddle shifters are standard and a five-speed automatic is the only available transmission.
That’s as negative as our review gets for the RDX. MacPherson struts at the front and a multi-link setup in the rear help the RDX corner far better than you would expect for a crossover, and that’s at the heart of this Acura’s appeal. Curving highway onramps become fun tests of the RDX’s abilities, followed by a burst of acceleration from the turbo engine. Around town, it’s not difficult to get wheelspin if you slam on the gas pedal. Spending the extra money on the all-wheel-drive system is worth it if you live in an area where it snows, or if you’ll push the RDX to 9/10 or all of its capabilities on back roads.
The RDX’s cabin is premium in a modern way — wood trim has no place in this Acura. The functions of the countless buttons on the center stack aren’t immediately clear, but become easier to use over the course of a couple days. At the front of the dash, a digital display shows temperature and sound system information. If you can afford it, go for the excellent 10-speaker Acura/ELS sound system, part of a technology package that includes a navigation system that is simple to use, but some information menus on the 8-inch screen look primitive. Electroluminescent gauges with blue accents feature a huge speedometer and smaller boost gauge. The sizable, lockable center console storage area can hold a computer.
Good outward visibility is one of the RDX’s strengths, especially because many SUVs sacrifice sightlines for bold styling and blind spot-monitoring systems. The Acura RDX’s dimensions allow for cargo space of 27.8 cubic feet with the rear seats in use and 60.6 cubic feet with those seats folded down. That compares to 30.8 and 67.4 cubic feet for the Volvo XC60 or 29.1 and 57.3 cubic feet for the Audi Q5.
Don’t forget about the upcoming TSX wagon, which is really the front-wheel-drive RDX’s first competitor. The similarly priced TSX isn’t likely to be as sporty as the RDX, but the wagon does have a cargo area capable of swallowing 31.5 cubic feet of stuff with the rear seats up and 60.5 cubic feet with the seats folded down. Those who want a sporty drive and are willing to accept a stiff ride should stick with the RDX.
Value is still a great reason to consider an Acura, but the RDX goes further by adding a sporty driving experience. In a crowded field of SUVs, sales of the front- and all-wheel-drive RDX lag behind every Acura except the RL and ZDX. Despite its faults, the 2011 RDX has a sense of purpose and should be able to maintain its niche in the luxury crossover market. Whether Acura continues to commit to the sporting nature of the RDX in its next generation is another question.

First Test: 2011 Dodge Durango R/T Free

This is the Durango that was never meant to be. A sporty SUV made no sense at all to the glorified accountants from Cerberus who ran Chrysler when the 2011 Durango was being developed, so it was never in the product plan. Ironically the bloodless moneymen were, on a purely rational level, correct: Attempting to turn a truck into a sports car is ultimately an exercise in futility. But the car business ain’t a rational business. If it were, there’d be no BMW X5, no Infiniti FX50, no Porsche Cayenne.
With its dubs, slammed suspension, and raucous exhaust, the 2011 Dodge Durango R/T may be every bit as pointless as a Mercedes-Benz ML 63 AMG, but we should all celebrate the fact it exists, because it means the car guys are back running the show in Auburn Hills. You can debate the Durango R/T’s relevance, but you can’t dispute the passion behind it.
The R/T was only added to the Durango lineup late last summer, pushed, says Dodge CEO and Chrysler design chief Ralph Gilles, by the team of young engineers assigned to create the road-biased SUV. (Off-road stuff? That’s Jeep’s role.) That’s a lightning-quick development arc in an industry where you need sign-off from the design, engineering, durability, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and legal departments before you can change a single component on a new vehicle.
 2011 Dodge Durango R/T

 2011 Dodge Durango R/T

 2011 Dodge Durango R/T

 2011 Dodge Durango R/T

 2011 Dodge Durango R/T

 2011 Dodge Durango R/T

 2011 Dodge Durango R/T

 2011 Dodge Durango R/T
 Back when we tested our long-term RDX, it sprinted from 0-60 mph at 7.0 seconds. Now that the front-wheel-drive crossover is 200 pounds lighter, expect a slightly improved time. RDX drivers will need to develop a lighter touch with the throttle or else fuel economy will suffer.
The brakes, too, were improved for the refreshed RDX. Acura says the upgrades result in more feel and less grabbiness to the binders, although they still are a touch on the sensitive side. Regardless, there’s no arguing with revised rear brake pad actuation that translates to less drag and longer pad life.
The RDX’s turbo makes it more responsive and engaging to drive than others in the segment, but if there’s a second generation of this vehicle, fuel economy must be a higher priority. The front-drive RDX’s fuel economy is rated at 19/24 mpg city/highway. For comparison, the turbocharged four-cylinder version of the all-wheel-drive 2011 Audi Q5 is rated 20/27 mpg, and the front- drive 2011 Volvo XC60 nets 18/25 mpg. The all-wheel-drive RDX does match the all-wheel-drive turbo XC60 in fuel economy, but the Volvo does it with two additional cylinders and more power and torque.
But the RDX’s turbo engine is part of its charm, and we would be disappointed if Acura offered a naturally aspirated four in its place. Steering feel is the 2011 RDX’s other drawback. More feedback and far more heft from the RDX’s high-quality leather-wrapped steering wheel would be welcome. Steering-wheel-mounted paddle shifters are standard and a five-speed automatic is the only available transmission.
That’s as negative as our review gets for the RDX. MacPherson struts at the front and a multi-link setup in the rear help the RDX corner far better than you would expect for a crossover, and that’s at the heart of this Acura’s appeal. Curving highway onramps become fun tests of the RDX’s abilities, followed by a burst of acceleration from the turbo engine. Around town, it’s not difficult to get wheelspin if you slam on the gas pedal. Spending the extra money on the all-wheel-drive system is worth it if you live in an area where it snows, or if you’ll push the RDX to 9/10 or all of its capabilities on back roads.
The RDX’s cabin is premium in a modern way — wood trim has no place in this Acura. The functions of the countless buttons on the center stack aren’t immediately clear, but become easier to use over the course of a couple days. At the front of the dash, a digital display shows temperature and sound system information. If you can afford it, go for the excellent 10-speaker Acura/ELS sound system, part of a technology package that includes a navigation system that is simple to use, but some information menus on the 8-inch screen look primitive. Electroluminescent gauges with blue accents feature a huge speedometer and smaller boost gauge. The sizable, lockable center console storage area can hold a computer.
Good outward visibility is one of the RDX’s strengths, especially because many SUVs sacrifice sightlines for bold styling and blind spot-monitoring systems. The Acura RDX’s dimensions allow for cargo space of 27.8 cubic feet with the rear seats in use and 60.6 cubic feet with those seats folded down. That compares to 30.8 and 67.4 cubic feet for the Volvo XC60 or 29.1 and 57.3 cubic feet for the Audi Q5.
Don’t forget about the upcoming TSX wagon, which is really the front-wheel-drive RDX’s first competitor. The similarly priced TSX isn’t likely to be as sporty as the RDX, but the wagon does have a cargo area capable of swallowing 31.5 cubic feet of stuff with the rear seats up and 60.5 cubic feet with the seats folded down. Those who want a sporty drive and are willing to accept a stiff ride should stick with the RDX.
Value is still a great reason to consider an Acura, but the RDX goes further by adding a sporty driving experience. In a crowded field of SUVs, sales of the front- and all-wheel-drive RDX lag behind every Acura except the RL and ZDX. Despite its faults, the 2011 RDX has a sense of purpose and should be able to maintain its niche in the luxury crossover market. Whether Acura continues to commit to the sporting nature of the RDX in its next generation is another question.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Smart ForSpeed concept revealed before 2011 Geneva Motor Show debut

Remember those leaked patent renderings that surfaced after New Years? Turns out it was no joke, as Smart has revealed the Forspeed concept car. Poised to debut at the Geneva Motor Show in 10 days, the Forspeed concept is an electric powered roadster.
The roofless design is reminiscent of the Smart Crossblade from 2002 but don’t be fooled, this is only a diversion of its true purpose – to preview the design of the next-generation fortwo and resurrected forfour five-door models.
In an interview with Mercedes head of design, Steffen Kohl told Auto Express, “Look at the fullness of the car’s exterior surfaces. This is important and will be reflected in future production models”.
The Forspeed is powered by a 40bhp (40 PS / 30 kW) electric motor mounted in the rear and has a range of 84 miles (135 km). There is also a 7bhp (7 PS / 5 kW) overboost feature which is activated by a flick of a switch. Top speed is 75 mph (120 km/h).

 2011 Geneva Motor Show

 2011 Geneva Motor Show

 2011 Geneva Motor Show

 2011 Geneva Motor Show
 Exterior features include a honeycomb mesh grille, LED headlamps, photovoltaic solar cells in the base of the windscreen and a hidden plug-in socket under the smart badge on the rear which leads down to a lithium-ion battery.
Like current smart models the interior pursues a “downsized premium” design as seen in the exposed mounting bolts in the door panels, center console and steering wheel. However, the shiny plastics with brushed aluminum and brown and green leather accents focus your attention elsewhere.
For the gadget saavy, smart has included a smart phone dock display console on the passenger side of the dash board. Surely real world safety concerns emerge as it forgoes an airbag and acts as an object that could cause head injury in a frontal collision, but this is just a concept and has no intentions of making it to production, according to Smart boss Dr. Annette Winkler.
An electric powered scooter and bicycle will be accompanying the Forspeed in Geneva. They are expected to hit the market in early 2013 followed by the next generation fortwo and fourfour models in 2014.

First Drive: 2012 Fisker Karma

In his Danish-tinged English, Henrick Fisker was thinking big as he cut into his steak “America needs a true premium car to compete with Mercedes-Benz and BMW. Cadillac hasn’t done it. And that car must be environmentally responsible, too — and it should come from California”. His glance around the dinner table was greeted with approving nods.
His knife continued its cutting.
Though wary of that knife, I had to ask anyway “So explain to me why that’s you and not Tesla?” (Fisker and Tesla have already tussled in court). Then I slightly cringed.
Henrick Fisker, however, hasn’t gotten to where he is by taking the bait from the likes of me. “The difference is that our car has no range anxiety. It can travel 50 miles as an electric vehicle, and another 250 miles using gasoline. And then…you just fill-up again.” Touché.

2012 Fisker Karma

2012 Fisker Karma

2012 Fisker Karma

2012 Fisker Karma
 genuinely unique proposition. Unlike that other extended-range electric vehicle people are making such a fuss about (rhymes with jolt), the Karma’s wheels are never ever, even slightly, mechanically connected its engine-generator unit (in this case, a turbocharged direct-injection, 2.0-liter GM Ecotec unit producing 260 hp). Whether that’s good or bad, it’s a genuine, 100% honest-to-goodness extended-range EV. To underline the point — and maybe take an irresistible poke at Tesla — there’s the script along the front fender: ‘EVer’ (Electric Vehicle, extended range). Goes for-EVer, get it?
However, if you do go choose to go forever, your Karma will be relying on the maximum 235-hp output of its engine-spun generator. Which, even if it pads the battery’s state-of-charge a bit during cruising (the engine-generator follows your power needs, not your right foot) probably won’t deliver much sizzle given the car’s estimated 4100-lb curb weight. On the other hand, those first fifty miles offer some interesting possibilities.
In what’s called Stealth mode, you can skulk around as a genuine, cross-your-heart EV, sourcing all your energy from the big, 20kW-hr Lithium-ion nanophosphate battery supplied by Watertown, Mass’s A123 Systems (the Volt, remember, has 16 kW-hrs, the Leaf, 24). Requiring six hours to charge (with 240 volts) it sits like a great monolith down the center of the car, bracketed by the engine/generator up front and the drive motors in back. Offering some 241 hp of electrical power, you can stealthily whine to 60 mph in a stated – and stately — 7.9 seconds…which is 4-banger Camry territory.
From an environmental standpoint, we might call this the ‘good Karma’. The ‘bad Karma’ emerges when you stand on the gas or flip the steering wheel paddle to Sport mode, whereupon the Fisker gets genuinely frisky (though still capable of an estimated 67 combined mpg following the SAE J2841 PHEV protocol). With the engine awake, and you’ve suddenly got two gushing tributaries of electrical power to surf down the road on.
At least for a while. Facing the full flood of electrons, the dual electric motors (coupled to act like one) shovel a nice 403 hp and a naughty 981 lb-ft of torque to the single-speed gear reduction. Technically, that’s more torque than a Bugatti Veryon — technically. At 5.9 seconds to 60 mph, the Sport-mode time is some 3.2 seconds slower than the mighty Bug’s, but it’s a swift and acoustically-interesting rush, nonetheless.
When battery propelled, the car sounds eerily like a taxiing jet — absolutely fascinating. Unfortunately, when the Ecotec engine chimes in — its exhaust hoarsely huffing from orifices just aft of the front wheels — you look around wondering where the Pontiac Solstice GXP is. When I mentioned this to the engineers they rolled their eyes and replied that a new exhaust is on the way. In a delightful irony, the Karma’s EV operation can be too quiet for unsuspecting pedestrians, so it emits an artificial but cool, future-world sound from both the car’s nose, and what appears to be dual exhausts at the rear. Go figure.
The brake pedal gives a nice, solid opposition to the ball of your foot, while squeezing the paddle on the right-side of the steering wheel lets you select between three intensities of regenerative braking. The most extreme of what Fisker calls Hill Decent Mode, gives a considerable brake-like tug when you lift off (it’s said that early EV drivers are really taking to this single-pedal driving). And here’s an odd one: when the battery is full, excess regenerated electricity can spin the generator (now behaving as a motor) which revolves the crankshaft for engine braking. Hmm.
Most of this, I pretty much expected. What completely flat-footed me was the car’s handling. With a low center of gravity, a 47/53 front/rear weight distribution, gigantic Fisker-designed 22-inch wheels (offering big cavities in which to optimize the suspension) and load-leveling dampers at the rear, the Karma is a sweetheart to hustle. It’s duck soup to step the tail out braking into a corner, and then hold it to the exit by playfully angling that potentiometer-thingy under your right foot. All the while there’s minimal roll and miniscule nose-dive under hard braking. Yet I couldn’t quite decide if I liked the steering feel itself; it seemed slightly imprecise on-center, and its ramp-up of effort, a little too shallow. There’s a difference between steering and handling.
Quite frankly, the electric car’s scotch-taped-glasses image has waited a century for a guy like Henrick Fisker to come along. His Karma is a jaw-slackening design manifesto from its fangy grill to its turbulent tail, with those giant wheels (amazingly, even bigger than the show car’s) punctuating it like the paws of a big jungle cat. Either prowling or at rest, the sun itself can provide a potential 200 miles of range per year via artistically integrated solar cells into the sweeping roof.
Of course the interior’s thick with artistry as well, the centerpiece being the beautifully rendered (though sunlight-vulnerable) graphics on the 10.2-inch multi-function ‘Command Center’ touch screen; I particularly liked the display’s size and haptic character. Tap it and the surface slightly depresses and reports a click, keeping your eyes more on the road. Like the Panamera, the Karma is a four-seater, but unlike the bustle-back Porsche, the slinkier, four-door coupe-like Fisker’s rear seat and trunk room are compact-scale. But gosh, the car’s so gorgeous it just might be worth it. And depending on trim level, the Karma’s eco-attentive interior can be accented with recovered wood (from either the bottom of Lake Michigan, or lumber felled by California’s celebrated storms and fires). Likewise, you can choose hides from pampered cattle (before they’re KILLED), while fewer of them will get whacked because hide waste is minimized by proudly including minor blemishes. And speaking of minor blemishes…the prototype Karma I drove had some noticeable squeaks and groans (although in fairness, without engine noise, electric vehicles are almost bare-naked, acoustically).
And this ought to be a lesson to any of you wise guys who think you can build your own car. Even with 400 employees, a platoon of superb engineers, a billion dollars in investment (including 529 mil from the Department of Energy, and the financially prescient Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers) — this ain’t easy. And as of my drive, production of the $96,850 Karma (the going up to $109,850) was a mere six weeks away (evidently, the early depositors are getting fidgety).
Which brings us back to Henrick Fisker’s dinner table declaration that the Karma is an American car. Maybe it was too much coffee, but the rarely-seen attack-dog journalist emerged again: “So tell me where it will be built?”
He pulled his iPhone from his pocket. “You tell me — is this an American product?” It is. But manufactured in China, I agreed. While Fisker’s next car will emerge from a shuttered, ex-GM factory in Delaware, the Karma will be built by Finland’s experienced Valmet Automotive, who manufacture the Cayman and Boxster. Right — these guys build Porsches.